Help: QoS managing crash at entry nº 60

[ingeniado]

Hello,

I’m configuring bandwith per IP. (70 hosts)
I’ve created chains and assigned them to interfaces.
I was creating the rules in the classifier and, when I was at entry number 60 (host nº 30, because 2 rules per IP: upstream & downstream), an “ERROR” message is shown under “QoS Rules” title. ❗
I can’t see the rules, neither ADD.
I did reboot the system and.. the problem persists.

(I use 1.0.beta5 version).

Thanks.
Michael

[imported_fulvio]

I will check and try to fix the bug in the next release.

Regards
Fulvio

[ingeniado]

OK.
I’ll waiting for next release.

Thanks very much.

regards
Michael

[imported_fulvio]

This bug has been fixed in the release 1.0.beta7.

Regards
Fulvio

[ingeniado]

Hello,

thanks for the new release, Fulvio.
Now, the classifier page doesn’t crash with 60 entries, but….
now a strange behaviour happens: 60th entry is duplicated, the second 60 entry lost the Qos class assignment and I can’t delete rear entries (61, 62..), because when I save the changes, these ones appear again 😕

any suggestion?

thanks.
Michael

[imported_fulvio]

Could you try with a new DB?

[ingeniado]

@fulvio wrote:

Could you try with a new DB?

Ok.
I’ll try, but it will take to me a long time.
I’ll post the result.

Thanks
Michael

[ajl37]

Hi,
I appear to have gotton around this problem.
I stopped QoS on my two cards (bridged) disabled the QoS rules.
Deleted them one at a time (which took a while) then saved (after deleting all 63 rules), re-enabled and added QoS back on the adapters. I now just need to add my rules back in, keeping it under 60 🙂

I am currently using 1.0beta6, upgrading to beta7 tomorrow.

Thanks
Andrew

[ingeniado]

@ajl37 wrote:

… I now just need to add my rules back in, keeping it under 60 🙂
…

Hello,

It is not entirely clear to me whether you have lost your rules or not…
Do you have kept 1-60 rules?

On the other hand, I think the big problem is that the web interface to manage the classifier is not suitable for a large number of rules/classes (>60). Is hard to support.
I think would be better an interface to manage rules in a group.

Thanks.
Michael

[ajl37]

When I originally started deleting rules 61 – 63, I saw the same results as you, rule 60 duplicated itself to 61-63. By deleting them all and then saving I managed to clear the entire QoS rules list. I then entered my 60 most important.

Its very true that the interface does not allow for easy creation of a large number of rules. It is certainly something I would like to see improved at some point, as I am currently using it to manage about 1000 clients (works very well).

Andrew

[ingeniado]

@ajl37 wrote:

It is certainly something I would like to see improved at some point, as I am currently using it to manage about 1000 clients (works very well).

If I’m not mistaken, If you want to manage bandwidth for 1000 clients (1000 IPs ?) you have to:
– Creating 1000×2 (upload, download) classes
– Assign 1000 classes to interface A, 1000 to interface B
– Configure 1000×2 rules in the classifier

Each “add action” takes one web page reload: 4000 web pages reload to get it.
At the moment, definititely Qos rules manager is not suitable for large number os rules. 😕

apart from that, Zeroshell is fantastic! 😉

regards
Michael

[Author]

Posts