› Forums › Network Management › ZeroShell › Zeroshell 3.8.0 released today
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 7, 2017 at 8:05 pm #44837
saraara
MemberZeroshell 3.8.0 has been released today.
Is it safe to upgrade without loosing configuration settings? What improvements has been added?
Fulvio can you please reply?
July 8, 2017 at 12:50 pm #54484reaperz
ParticipantI upgraded several different routers to 3.8.0 and works fine.
But do not, I repeat DO NOT INSTALL 64-bit kernel!
After choosing “64-Bit Kernel 4.9.36 ” to boot, my routers did not come up.
Needed physical intervention.
July 11, 2017 at 1:52 pm #54485DrmCa
ParticipantI would wait at least a few months
July 11, 2017 at 4:33 pm #54486pLastUn
ParticipantI have a 64-bit kernel running.
32-bit is not good, consumes a lot of RAM!
July 11, 2017 at 4:36 pm #54487pLastUn
Participant@DrmCa wrote:
I would wait at least a few months
Fulvio writes “The upgrading to this release is recommended.”
July 11, 2017 at 6:14 pm #54488cdpearce
ParticipantWas the bad 64-bit experience running on raw hardware? Or in some VM environment? I am running ZS on raw hardware.
Out of interest, what is the recovery procedure if it fails to boot? How easy is it to get the system to boot from the other kernel slot with the known-good system? I haven’t needed to try it yet, and would rather figure out how before the system is broken instead of afterwards!
July 12, 2017 at 8:58 pm #54489DrmCa
Participant@pLastUn wrote:
@DrmCa wrote:
I would wait at least a few months
Fulvio writes “The upgrading to this release is recommended.”
Over my 25 year IT career I heard and ignored many recommendations to upgrade, which saved me from having too much gray hair and wasting too much time and $$ on recovering from downtime.
If you are looking for the latest example, look no further than .NET 4.7 fiasco with Exchange, which is not only affecting Exchange actually.
OMG, the above memory utilization is horrible. I’ve never been over 126 MB in the last 10 or so years, even after a year of uptime. And I’ve always been running a 32 bit kernel.
July 13, 2017 at 9:11 am #54490reaperz
Participant@cdpearce wrote:
Was the bad 64-bit experience running on raw hardware? Or in some VM environment? I am running ZS on raw hardware.
Out of interest, what is the recovery procedure if it fails to boot? How easy is it to get the system to boot from the other kernel slot with the known-good system? I haven’t needed to try it yet, and would rather figure out how before the system is broken instead of afterwards!
I am currently managing total of 6 Zeroshell routers. 5 of them are physical, 1 in virtualbox. All currently running 3.8.0, 32-bit. Memory usage currently between 90 and 120MB. 2 failed upgrade routers were physical.
Recovery procedure was simple: connect keyboard and display, restart router. And then select previous kernel from boot menu. Later uninstall problematic 64-bit kernel package from web interface.
DrmCa: I am also usually “if it works, don fix it” kind of IT-guy. But I have had so good experience with upgrading Zeroshell before, so I mistakenly expected it to work out fine this time too.
Mistake was also running kernel upgrade in 2 routers at the same time. Should have just upgraded my home router and seen it did not work. Would have saved me driving around the city on friday evening 😀
I won’t touch this 64-bit kernel until next release.
If it matters, then my upgrade path was:
3.7.1 (4.4.39) –> 4.4.39 64-bit kernel –> 4.9.27 64-bit kernel –> 3.80 (4.9.36) –> 4.9.36 64-bit kernel (boot fail)
July 14, 2017 at 10:33 am #54491alpha_wall
MemberI just upgraded to 3.8 and the 64 bit kernel.
The process was flawless and worked just fine, no big issue memory usage seems to be stable or actually slightly lower.July 17, 2017 at 2:09 pm #54492iulyb
Member@DrmCa wrote:
I would wait at least a few months
I am stuck at 3.7.1 with 4.9.27-ZS , 32 bits.
I tried 3.8 on a vbox dev env in order to compile apu drivers but dev env is still broken, I get segmentation fault error when I try to compile the kernel.As for memory utilization.. never paid attention:
Memory 3629532 kB (5% used)July 18, 2017 at 1:43 pm #54493DrmCa
ParticipantThat’s around 177 MB and is pretty low.
July 18, 2017 at 4:57 pm #54494Montikore
ParticipantFYI, i faced a quite big issue : the update modified my admin password!!! (i had to boot a live linux to retrieve it), and transform all $ characters to _ characters…
Don’t know about other characters…August 8, 2017 at 12:59 am #54495mountainman
ParticipantFWIW, I just upgraded to 3.8.0 from 3.6 using the package manager. No issues at all, if anything memory usage is slightly down and performance seems somewhat better (though it might just be a slow night). I did not install the 64 bit kernel.
October 12, 2017 at 7:57 pm #54496sukupandachu
ParticipantHi group,
I keep getting random reboots on my ZS, running on Proxmox host.
version 3.8 keeps rebooting randomly.
I have tried clean installs, and also upgrades.
The results are the same.
Everytime I go back to v3.7.1, it works again fine.The vm has the following features:
2GB RAM
5GB HDD
2 x network devices Intel E1000 (vmbr0 and vmbr2)Disk details seem good, I can see available space:
root@zs ~> df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
tmpfs 1011M 16M 996M 2% /
/dev/sr0 275M 275M 0 100% /cdrom
shm 1011M 0 1011M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/vda4 4.0G 3.2G 580M 85% /DB
/DB/_DB.002 4.0G 3.2G 580M 85% /DatabaseAdmin logs show the reboots follow no time_related pattern:
00:14:24 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
01:07:01 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
04:27:08 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
06:16:46 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
12:20:54 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
12:48:09 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
12:57:58 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
15:40:36 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
16:41:11 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
17:47:12 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
20:02:51 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0
20:32:51 SUCCESS: System successfully started with Linux kernel 4.9.36-ZS and ZeroShell 3.8.0I cannot see a reason for reboot.
Proxmox vm running the zeroshell does not report error either, it shows it’s up all the time.Do you recommend anywhere else to check?
My workaround is to go back to v3.7.1, but might not be a safe choice.Any feedback would be kindly appreciated.
October 13, 2017 at 4:12 pm #54497DrmCa
ParticipantI’d downgrade and leave it, your config is way over what ZS needs, so the new kernel would be the only thing to blame.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.