Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
dodoman999
MemberNow don’t start yelling at me but i’v tried something else, don’t know if its a good thing or bad thing, I only had natted eth01 (my internet connection, sorry should have put this also in my first post), i put eth0 (my lan) also in the nat and now it works how i wanted it to work BUT is this allowed (secure is the better word)?
Now it looks like this:
– zeroshell 1.0.beta12 (usb)
– eth0 = lan (dhcp 192.168.1.11- 192.168.1.253, webserver at 192.168.1.4)
– eth1 = wan (adsl modem, internet is working within the lan)
– virtual server = any/my ip tcp 80 192.168.1.4:80 (CHANGED)
– https only for 192.168.1.3 else i always get the zeroshell login page
– firewall no changes = accept on all three (input, output and forward and no new rules)
– NAT eth00 and eth01 natted (CHANGED)
Now it looks like everything works how i wanted.Please can you give me your opinion (based on miy info) if its ok or am i doing something weird with natting both eth00 and eth01.
dodoman999
MemberI’ve added the rule (yum)
– virtual server = eth00/myip 80 192.168.1.4:80
But the result is still the same, site can be reach from internet but not from lan with the site name/adress, site can be reached by lan via 192.168.1.4/site.I have not played around with dns, so that is something I have to take a look at.
No solution yet but thank you for the reply
dodoman999
MemberMore info:
From the outside (internetside) the website is being reached, so that is working but within the lan i cannot reach the site except if i use 192.168.1.4/site but this is not the way i want to do it, normally i type the adress in the browser and the site comes up, this is important for me to get it working like this because i want to do some more port forwarding where i have the same problem, so port forwarding within the lan, i hope this all makes sense? -
AuthorPosts